CombineApps logoCombineApps

Support workflows

Build support workflows where context follows the customer, not the ticket

Ground suggested responses in approved sources and escalate uncertain or high-impact cases with full context.

Connect ticketing, CRM, product, billing, knowledge, and engineering systems. Agents retrieve grounded context and prepare actions. Automation handles routing and status. Uncertain, sensitive, or high-impact cases escalate to people.

Example flow

Designed around your controls

  1. 1

    Request

    Email, chat, form, or service event

  2. 2

    Triage

    Intent, priority, account, and duplicate check

  3. 3

    Ground

    Approved knowledge and live account context

  4. 4

    Resolve

    Bounded action or human-reviewed response

  5. 5

    Learn

    Escalation, status, and knowledge feedback

Operational friction

Where support work loses momentum

Context stops at the queue

Account, product, billing, prior conversation, and incident details live outside the active ticket.

Transfers repeat the investigation

Support, engineering, finance, and customer-success teams rebuild the same evidence during escalation.

Knowledge drifts from reality

Recurring issues expose missing or outdated guidance, but the feedback rarely reaches a clear owner.

Workflows we can build

Start with one bounded workflow

These are examples, not claimed customer results. Discovery confirms the systems, permissions, edge cases, and authority required.

01

Omnichannel intake and triage

Normalize email, chat, and form requests, detect possible duplicates, classify context, and route ownership.

  1. Normalize intake
  2. Check duplicates
  3. Add account context
  4. Route by explicit rules
02

Grounded resolution assistant

Retrieve current approved knowledge, account, product, and billing context, then draft cited responses or use narrow actions.

  1. Authenticate context
  2. Retrieve approved sources
  3. Draft or act narrowly
  4. Escalate uncertainty
03

Escalation and incident handoff

Detect service-level risk or complexity, create specialist work with evidence attached, and synchronize status back.

  1. Detect escalation
  2. Assemble evidence
  3. Create specialist work
  4. Sync resolution status
04

Knowledge and quality loop

Cluster recurring issues, identify missing or outdated articles, draft updates, and sample conversations for owner review.

  1. Sample cases
  2. Find recurring gaps
  3. Draft update
  4. Knowledge owner approves

Stack architecture

Add intelligence between your systems, not outside their controls

Systems

Approved tools and events

Context

Scoped data and documents

Rules / agent

Stable rules plus bounded AI

Approval / action

Authority matches the risk

Logs

Result, errors, and evidence

Integrations

Connect the support tools you already use

These are platforms we can build custom integrations for—not one-click connector claims. Scope depends on edition, API access, permissions, limits, and security needs.

See all integrations

Baselines, not claims

Decide what improvement means before the build

These are measurement areas. They are not promises or past customer results. We baseline the current workflow and agree how each metric will be calculated.

Service time

First response, assignment, resolution, queue time, and performance against service levels.

Handoff quality

Transfer, escalation, reopen, repeat-contact, and missing-context rates.

Assistant quality

Grounding coverage, agent edits, fallback rate, knowledge freshness, and unsafe-action blocks.

Support guardrail

Human authority stays visible

An assistant should cite approved sources, respect account and role boundaries, and stop when context is missing or an action affects billing, access, privacy, or contractual commitments.

Common questions

Direct answers before discovery

Can a support agent answer customers automatically?

Only bounded cases with current approved knowledge and clear escalation rules should be considered for automatic responses. Sensitive, uncertain, or high-impact cases should go to a person.

Can the workflow update billing or product systems?

Potentially, through narrow allowlisted operations. Refunds, credits, access changes, and other consequential actions should use explicit permissions and approval rules.

How do you prevent unsupported answers?

Use approved sources, source citations, retrieval filters, confidence or coverage checks, refusal behavior, representative evaluation cases, and human review samples.

Start with the workflow

Improve one support journey

Bring a recurring request or escalation. We will map its sources, permissions, resolution paths, fallbacks, and measurement baseline.

Discuss your workflow